Factors influence motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment and the ability of the employees’ performance on The Djayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel,
ABSTRACT
M. Hafiz, influence factors of motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment and the ability of the employees’ performance on The Djayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel, guided by Wiwin Agustian and Jake Darmawan. This study aims to identify and analyze what factors and the influence of factors – these factors on the performance of work on the Djayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel. This study includes quantitative descriptive research. The population in this study were all employees of The Jayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel totaling 61 employees. Sampling techniques sampling saturation where all the population sampled. The analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis, correlation coefficients, t test, f test and coefficient of determination.
Keywords: motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment, ability, achievement of work
INTRODUCTION
The company is one of the forms of organization that underwent management functions such as planning, organizing, directing. Control is any business or activity to determine the actual reality of the implementation of the task or activity, whether in accordance with the proper or not. If an employer can exercise control over subordinates well, the control functions in the organization can function properly. Controls can also mean seeking what is to be implemented in accordance with the rules and instructions that are planned to assess the work and if necessary conduct remedial action.
The Jayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel is a 4-star hotel located in the center of Palembang and has 168 rooms of different types and a fully equipped facility provided to pamper the consumer. The Jayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel was established in 2007, therefore the company in demand to increase sales of rooms and other facilities to achieve profit targets are set so as to achieve break even (the breakeven point) are determined. To support the services provided by the company have the energy – experienced experts that can improve service delivery. The constraints on the company’s motivation is the lack of sports facilities such as futsal and badminton company provides to employees in order to improve the performance and also the lack of outdoor activities such as outbound kekompakkan can improve morale and employee, that employee relations are getting better . The Jayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel is a 4-star hotel located in the center of Palembang and has 168 rooms of different types and a fully equipped facility provided to pamper the consumer. The Jayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel was established in 2007, therefore the company in demand to increase sales rooms and other facilities to achieve profit targets are set so as to achieve break even (the breakeven point) are determined. To support the services provided by the company have the energy – experienced experts that can improve service delivery. The constraints on the company’s motivation is the lack of sports facilities such as futsal and badminton company provides to employees in order to improve the performance and also the lack of outdoor activities such as outbound kekompakkan can improve morale and employee, that employee relations are getting better .
Based on the above, the authors are interested in trying to do research on “Influence factors of motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment and the ability of the employees’ performance on The Djayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel”.
THEORETICAL
Understanding Motivation
Nitisemito, (2006: 86) motivation that affects the spirit and excitement of working is very important for a company to achieve its objectives DAPT. Morale is doing the job harder, and thus would be expected to work faster and better. While the excitement of the work is a profound pleasure to work being done.
Understanding the Workplace
According Nitisemito, (2000:183) defines the work environment as follows: “The work environment is everything that is around the workers who can influence him in carrying out the tasks entrusted”.
Understanding Work Prestsi
Martoyo, (2000:56) In addition, the impact is not motivating, but it will decrease employee performance. In order to improve the performance of the factors that influence it should be noted, that motivation, job satisfaction, stress levels, physical work conditions, compensation systems, economic aspects, technical aspects, and other behaviors.
Hypothesis
The hypothesis used in this study are:
H1: There is significant influence between Achievement Motivation to Work
H2: There is significant influence between job satisfaction of the Performance Work
H3: There is a significant effect between the Physical Environment Work performance
H4: There is a significant effect between the ability to Occupational Performance
H5: There is a significant effect between motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment, and the ability to work performance.
RESEARCH METEDOLOGI
Population and Sample Collection Techniques
The population is a region consisting of the generalization objects or subjects that have quality and characteristics are determined by the investigator to be studied and then drawn conclusions (Sugiyono, 2004: 78). The population in this study were all employees of The Djayakarta Daira Palembang Hotel totaling 61 people.
Sampling is the technique of determining the sample is saturated when all members of the population is used as a sample. Other terms of the census sample is saturated. In this sample population the authors take as many as 61 people.
DISCUSSION
Analysis of Testing
4.6.1 Multiple Linear Regression Analysis
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Standardized Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1. (Constant), 918, 534 1.718, 091
Motivational factors, 402, 164, 389 2.448, 018
Job satisfaction, 133, 122, 139 1.088, 281
The physical environment, 184, 086, 242 2.131, 037
Ability -, 004, 149 -, 004 -, 029, 977
a. Dependent Variable: prestasikerja
Source: Primary Data that has been processed by the SPSS 20.0
Based on the regression results contained in the table show the influence of regression equations motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment, the ability to work performance are as follows:
Y = 0.918 + 0.402 + 0.113 + 0.184 to 0.004 + e
From the regression equation above can dikatahui that:
1. A constant value of 0.918 means that if the motivation (X1), job satisfaction (X2), physical environment (X3), ability (X4, equal to zero then the accomplishment of work will be worth 0.918.
2. Motivation regression coefficient (b1) = 0.402 means that if motivation has increased by one unit score, the performance of the (Y) will also be increased by 0.402.
3. Job satisfaction regression coefficient (b2) = 0.113 means that if increased job satisfaction score by one unit, then the performance of the (Y) will be decreased by 0.113.
4. Regression coefficient of the physical environment (b3) = 0.184 means that if the physical environment has increased by one unit score, the performance of the (Y) will also be increased by 0.184.
5. Regression coefficient capabilities (b4) = -0.004 means that if the ability had penururnan score by one unit, then the performance of the (Y) will be decreased by -0.004,.
Coefficient of Determination
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1, 587a, 345, 298, 49 799
a. Predictors: (Constant), ability, physical environment, job satisfaction, motivation factors
Sources: Primary data that has been processed by the SPSS 20.0
Magnitude coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.345 indicates that the dependent variable has the job performance of determination of 34.5% can be explained by the independent variables, namely motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment, and ability. While the remaining 65.5% is explained by other factors not included in this study as compensation (iswahyu Hartati, 2005) and associated factors (ni ketut sariyathi, 2003).
Correlation Coefficient
Based on statistical calculations are shown in Table 4.4.2 of the obtained values of correlation (R) of 0.587 indicates that the independent variables are motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment, and the ability to have enough cohesion to the dependent variable job performance.
Value Table correlation coefficient or r
Coefficient Interval
Level Relations
0.00 to 0.19 Very Low
0.20 to 0.399 Low
0.40 to 0.599 Enough
0.60 to 0.799 Strong
0.80 to 1.00 Very Strong
Sources: Sugiyono, 2005: 216
Partial test (t test)
This test is used to determine if a variable in the regression model partially significant effect on the dependent variable (Priyanto, 2010: 68). Test – t can be seen from the following table:
Partial test (t test)
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1. (Constant), 918, 534 1.718, 091
Motivational factors, 402, 164, 389 2.448, 018
Job satisfaction, 133, 122, 139 1.088, 281
The physical environment, 184, 086, 242 2.131, 037
Ability -, 004, 149 -, 004 -, 029, 977
a. Dependent Variable: prestasikerja
Source: Primary Data that has been processed SPSS 20.0
1. Effect of Motivation on Work Performance
Based on the results of testing the partial effect of motivation on work performance using the SPSS program as shown in Table 4.4.4 were obtained for 2.448 t count> t table 1.671 with a significance level of 0.018 <a = 0.05 we can conclude that Ho is rejected and Ha accepted . This indicates that the influence of motivation on work performance.
2. Effect of Job Satisfaction on Job Performance
Based on the results of testing the partial effect of satisfaction with work performance using the SPSS program as shown in Table 4.4.4 were obtained t count for 1.088 <t TABLE1, 671 with a significance level of 0.281 <a = 0.05 it can be concluded that Ho accepted and Ha rejected . This suggests that the absence of influence of job satisfaction on job performance.
3. Effect of Physical Environment on Work Performance
Based on the results of testing the partial effect of the physical environment on job performance using the SPSS program as shown in Table 4.4.4 were obtained for 2.131 t count> t table 1.671 with a significance level of 0.037 <a = 0.05 we can conclude that Ho is rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that the influence of the physical environment on job performance.
4. Influence Ability to Work Achievement
Based on the test results a partial effect on work performance capabilities by using SPSS program as shown in Table 4.4.4 were obtained t count equal to -0.029 <t table 1.671 with a significance level of 0.977> a = 0.05 it can be concluded that Ho accepted and Ha rejected . This suggests that the absence of the ability to influence job performance.
Simultaneous Test (Test F)
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 7.315 4 1.829 7.374, 000b
Residual 13.888 56, 248
Total 21.202 60
a. Dependent Variable: prestasikerja
b. Predictors: (Constant), ability, physical environment, job satisfaction, motivation factors
Sources: Primary data that has been processed by the SPSS 20.0
From the above table shows that the value of F count was 7.374 and the F-tables with significance level 2.54 0.000. Significant value less than 0.05. Simultaneous Test 7.374> 2.54 or 0.000 <a = 0.05, then there is a significant effect of motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment and the ability to work performance.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusion
Magnitude coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.345 indicates that the dependent variable has the job performance of determination of 34.5% can be explained by the independent variables, namely motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment, and ability. While the remaining 65.5% is explained by other factors not included in this study as compensation (iswahyu Hartati, 2005) and associated factors (ni ketut sariyathi, 2003).
F test results seen from the figures that showed significant regression of probability of 7.374 F-count> t table 2.54 level of significance 0.000 <α = 0.05 can thus be concluded Ho is rejected and Ha accepted means of motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment and the ability of the employees’ performance at The Jayakarta Daira Palembang hotel.
F test results seen from the figures that showed significant regression of probability of 7.374 F-count> t table 2.54 level of significance 0.000 <α = 0.05 can thus be concluded Ho is rejected and Ha accepted means of motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment and the ability of the employees’ performance at The Jayakarta Daira Palembang hotel.
Suggestion
See any significant effect of the variable yan motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment and the ability of the employees’ performance. Further enhance the company’s good motivation, more attention to the site, take more attention to the state of the workplace, more selective in recruiting skilled employees, and further improve the performance wickedness that will facilitate the achievement of the corporate objectives.
For further research to investigate the factors of motivation, job satisfaction, physical environment and the ability of the employees’ performance then you should examine the influence of leadership on employee performance to make this research more perfect.
References
Dharma. , 2005. Personnel and Resource Management Manusia.Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Hasibuan. , 2003. Organization and Motivation. London: Earth Literacy.
Niti Seminto, S. Alex. , 2006. Personnel Management. Jakarta: Indonesia Ghalia.
Sedarmayanti. , 2001. Work Efficiency for State Development. Jakarta: grants.
Siagian, P. Sondra. , 2007. Administrative Leadership and Organizational Behavior. Jakarta: Mount Agung.
Sudarmo, Gil. , 2001. Research A Practice Approach Procedures. Jakarta: Rineka Notices.
Sugiyono. , 2003. Statistics for Research. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Teguh, Muhammad. 2000. Governance Office. Bandung: Alumni.
